FCA response to recent High Court Motor Finance Judicial Review Decision
This week the High Court found in favour of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) in a review of its decision to uphold a complaint…
This week the High Court found in favour of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) in a review of its decision to uphold a complaint…
The High Court has found in favour of the Financial Ombudsman in a review of its decision to uphold a complaint relating to a discretionary commission arrangement in a motor finance agreement.
The UK Supreme Court has decided to grant permission to appeal in the case of Johnson v. FirstRand Bank Ltd. This landmark case is poised to redefine consumer protection and financial accountability in the motor finance industry.
The FCA has announced a significant delay in its timeline for deciding on potential mis-selling of car finance claims. We discuss what this means for consumers.
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is proposing to give motor finance firms more time to address complaints about commission disclosures.
In addition to our instant car finance agreement finder, we recommend 7 ways to find historical car finance agreements to start your claim for mis-sold car finance.
Bott and Co recognise the concerns raised in a recent article regarding the use of solicitors and claims management companies for mis-sold car finance claims, however we feel that certain aspects of the article did not fully reflect the broader context of our work.
In a major development for car finance claimants, the FCA today announced a consultation to extend the timeframe for responding to non-DCA motor finance commission complaints.
The recent Court of Appeal decision in the cases of Johnson, Wrench, and Hopcraft marks a significant development in the realm of financial law, particularly concerning car finance commission payments to third parties.
The decision of the Court of Appeal on the cases of Johnson, Wrench and Hopcraft were published today and there was a resounding, unanimous…
Bott and Co has joined forces with Reclaim247 to make the car finance claims process much simpler. Through the collaboration of multiple award winning…
Despite legal rulings, both lenders and high street banks are stalling on their obligations towards the thousands of consumers who have been deceived by their unfair practices.
Legal rights for individuals who may have been mis sold car finance agreements may be significantly improved after the Financial Ombudsman Service reached a decision on a test case involving a Bott and Co client.
A decision from the Financial Ombudsman Service in relation to the mis-selling of car finance agreements is expected to be made imminently. It is hoped that the imminent decision finally provides a clear legal precedent on how these types of claims can be made.
In a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court, consumers who have been mis-sold financial products may now have a stronger chance of successfully claiming against lenders for not disclosing broker commission details.
In March 2019, the findings of an investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) uncovered concerning evidence of widespread unclear and excessive car finance costs, affecting millions of UK drivers. Even more shocking is the discovery that the secret commission methods were used on what is commonly represented to be the most cost-effective way of buying a car.